Re: O(1) scheduler, 2.5.2-pre9-B1 results

[Ingo Molnar]

On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> communication latencies: Pipe, AF, TCP slightly up (BAD)

this is mainly because i have not made the O(1) scheduler fully aware of
synchronous wakeups yet. I'm working on this part now that the bugs are
fixed. If you remove synchronous wakeups from the stock kernel then you'll
see processes distributed to different CPUs but bad lmbench latencies.

> So far things look good. Next up I'll look at how it scales on the 12
> way.

thanks!

	Ingo