"More", in what way? Fixed more problem cases or just better in sense that
he refromatted and splitted the long ext2_new_inode() function?
> but I think it is too much change to be adding to 2.2, so we should use
> the minimal fix from Daniel, unless there are objections.
Ok. The minimal approach is what I was after, too :).
Do you have any opionion about 2.0? The problem has been spotted on 2.0.39,
too, and the 2.0.40pre3 ext2_new_inode() is almost identical to 2.2 one
barring few trivialish changes. We plan to test the patch some more on 2.0
(we already know it compiles and boots, btw ;), but it would be nice if some
one who has played with 2.0 ext2 would give a "go ahead".
-- v --
v@iki.fi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/