Re: [CFT] [JANITORIAL] Unbork fs.h

Christoph Hellwig (hch@ns.caldera.de)
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:45:55 +0100


In article <E16M7Gz-00015E-00@starship.berlin> you wrote:
> - inode = get_empty_inode();
> + inode = get_empty_inode(sb);

How about killing get_empty_inode completly and using new_inode() instead?
There should be no regularly allocated inode without a superblock.

Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/