Re: Serial Driver Name Question (kernels 2.4.x)

[Andrew Morton]

Richard Gooch wrote:
> 
> > Instead, it appears that someone broke tty_name().  Here's the
> > 2.2 kernel's version:
> 
> That "someone" was me, and I changed it from broken to fixed.
> 

Look at serial.c:

#if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE > 0x2032D && defined(CONFIG_DEVFS_FS))
        serial_driver.name = "tts/%d";
#else
        serial_driver.name = "ttyS";
#endif

tty_name will just print "ttyS".   So the transition for this case
was fixed->broken.

> 
> No, originally tty_name() did it, and then I shifted it to the
> drivers. I don't recall the reason, but it was necessary. So I don't
> want this changed.

Oh dear.  Why cannot devfs expand the minor part itself?

It looks like all the drivers need to be given a %d, as Ivan suggests.  And we
need to audit all uses to make sure nobody is doing printk(driver.name);

I think it would be better to drop the printf control construct from the
names altogether.

-