Re: [PATCH] rlimit_nproc

[Legacy Fishtank]

On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:35:38PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Also worthwhile for automation is an md5sum or similar (for verifying that
> the mail made it though the mail system unscathed). A pgp signature would
> be even better, of course - especially useful as I suspect it would be
> good to also cc the things to some patch-list, and having a clear identity
> on the sender is always a good idea in these things.

I've been thinking that a "[e-mail]" dumping ground would be
useful.

This is NOT intended as a patch tracker.  This is NOT intended as a
substitution for submitting the patch to you, but instead intended
as a patch archive that doesn't go away.  We have seen linux-kernel
archives come and go, or drop messages.  But a patch archive would be
useful...  I'm not sure a mailing list proper is right for the job,
since I want to support the reception and archiving of multi-megabyte
patches at times.

	Jeff