It's confusing enough with the 10 "Mb" networking / 1.44 "MB" floppy
distinction already..
At 11:02 -0700 Steven Cole wrote:
>Now, granted that this is the "standard", should there be some discussion related to this
>change, or is everyone comfortable with this? It certainly made me do a double take.
>
>Here is a snippet from the diff between versions 2.75 and 2.76 of Configure.help:
>
>@@ -344,8 +344,8 @@
> If you are compiling a kernel which will never run on a machine with
> more than 960 megabytes of total physical RAM, answer "off" here
> (default choice and suitable for most users). This will result in a
>- "3GB/1GB" split: 3GB are mapped so that each process sees a 3GB
>- virtual memory space and the remaining part of the 4GB virtual memory
>+ "3GiB/1GiB" split: 3GiB are mapped so that each process sees a 3GiB
>+ virtual memory space and the remaining part of the 4GiB virtual memory
> space is used by the kernel to permanently map as much physical memory
> as possible.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/