Re: [PATCH] kill(-1,sig)

Richard B. Johnson (root@chaos.analogic.com)
Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:06:47 -0500 (EST)


On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>
> Note that I've reverted the kill(-1...) thing in my personal tree: so far
> I've gotten a lot of negative feedback, and the change doesn't seem to
> actually buy us anything except for conformance to a unclearly weasel-
> worded standards sentence where we could be even more weasely and just say
> that "self" is a special process from the systems perspective.
>
> Linus
>

Isn't the de-facto standard that:

kill -<sig> -1

... should send the signal to everyone but the one executing the call?

For years, the "quick way" to shut down a Unix system was:

kill -TERM -1
sync
kill -KILL -1
sync
umount -a

... hit power switch...

Eliminating the ability to shut down a system in a few seconds is
gonna make a lot of persons unhappy --especially if one has to run
the RH kiddie scripts that take forever......

Cheers,
Dick Johnson

Penguin : Linux version 2.4.1 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Santa Claus is coming to town...
He knows if you've been sleeping,
He knows if you're awake;
He knows if you've been bad or good,
So he must be Attorney General Ashcroft.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/