I applied all the way to 40_blkdev-pagecache-17 in 2.4.10-pre10aa1.
> >
> > # time /bin/cp * /tmp/
> > real 0m8.952s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.190s
> >
> >
> > 3. 2.4.10-pre11
> >
> > # time /bin/cp * /tmp/
> > real 0m8.851s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.170s
>
> but the above have nothing to do with the blkdev-pagecache.
> Blkdev-pagecache can matter only with blkdev accesses, blkdev-pagecache
> cannot make any difference if the I/O passes through any fs (not via the
> block_dev layer) like in the above case.
That is why I said it was strange.
>
> Can you try to take those cp under strace timestamp and see what's the
> syscall that blocks?
It blocks on read.
H.J.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/