Re: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16

Dan Maas (dmaas@dcine.com)
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:37:55 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: 2.4.16 problem...."
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Configure.help 2.4.17 update patch"

> > Yes, throughtput-only tests will have their numbers degradated with the
> > change applied on 2.4.16-pre2.
> >
> > The whole thing is just about tradeoffs: Interactivity vs throughtput.
> >
> > I'm not going to destroy interactivity for end users to get beatiful
> > dbench numbers.
>
> Latency is more of an issue for end user machines.

Time for CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_THROUGHPUT / CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_LATENCY ?

Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: 2.4.16 problem...."
Previous message: Bill Davidsen: "Re: Configure.help 2.4.17 update patch"