Re: TCP LAST-ACK state broken in 2.4.17-pre2

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:13:32 -0800 (PST)


From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:34:47 +0300 (MSK)

Dave, "official" patch will follow later. I must think about
some marginal effect in TCP_CLOSE_WAIT and TCP_CLOSING, which can break
out of switch too. Duh, do specs say something about segments with seqs
above fin? I do not remember.

A socket in a synchronized state is required to enforce legal sequence
numbers, is it not?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/