Re: [CFT] tree-based bootmem

[Robert Love]

On Sat, 2001-12-08 at 18:40, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> I've waited a week or two for bug reports to roll in from early testers
> (including myself), and no reports have come in.
> 
> So now I humbly request the assistance of a larger userbase in testing
> the bootmem patch.

Patch successfully tested on (3) i386 machines, an SH4 machine, and a
sparc32 machine.  And on the low memory SH4 machine, the
finer-granularity of addressing is welcome.

Now, when do we see some interface changes to bootmem that take
advantage of your patch? :-)

	Robert Love