Here's the results of testing my Thinkpad T20 with P3-650:
Version 1.93 write read putcNT getcNT putc getc putcU getcU
lyta 142 651 8189 9348 1763 1813 22174 44887
lyta,142,651,8189,9348,1763,1813,22174,44887
Here's the results of testing my Athlon 800 play machine:
Version 1.93 write read putcNT getcNT putc getc putcU getcU
test 146 607 7356 7280 1834 1971 41995 59100
test,146,607,7356,7280,1834,1971,41995,59100
Both machines run ReiserFS. A quick test indicates that using Ext2 instead
of ReiserFS triples the performance of write(fd, buf, 1), but this is
something I already knew (and had mentioned before on the ReiserFS list).
Also based on previous tests I expect Solaris to outperform Linux with glibc
on putcNT, getcNT, putc, and getc. The regular performance of putc() on
Solaris comes close to putc_unlocked() on Linux with glibc.
I'd like to thank Andrew Morton for forwarding messages from L-K that
provoked me to write this new test program.
I was tempted to subscribe to L-K to join this discussion, but it seems that
Linus is saying everything that needs to be said anyway so there's no point.
;)
-- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/