Re: Linux 2.4.17-pre5

Stephan von Krawczynski (skraw@ithnet.com)
Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:55:30 +0100


On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 14:43:06 +1100
Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> wrote:

> On Fri, 07 Dec 2001 01:12:53 +0100,
> Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> wrote:
> >BTW, for the further ongoing of this patch, I ran into the question if
> >
> >MODULE_PARM(type, "1-(16)i");
> >
> >would be a valid statement. I guess not. But if not, could some kind
> >soul please explain to me how to get rid of the braces "(" ")" given
> >in definitions from CONFIG stuff.
> >
> >E.g.:
> >
> >CONFIG_ME_BEING_DUMB (16)
>
> Don't do that. CONFIG numbers are expected to be plain numbers, not
> expressions, e.g. CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_DEFAULT_TAGS=16, not (16).
> Given the fragility of CML1 I would not be surprised if (16) broke some
> of the shell scripts.

Huh!!

There is a problem: I made a (really small) patch to Config.in saying:

int ' Maximum number of cards supported by HiSax' CONFIG_HISAX_MAX_CARDS 8

If I check this in the source, it gives me CONFIG_HISAX_MAX_CARDS as (8)

Can you check this out please. It doesn't look like I could do anything against
this.
How do you make your CONFIG-definitions come back without "()" ?

Regards,
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/