I think you'll find that a common theme amongst people with experience.
I also will point out that what you are saying is exactly what I and
every other young hotshot said in our twenties. It's funny how when
you let 15 years go by the people that you argued with in the past
suddenly become right. It's certainly been a pattern in my life that
when I argue with people who are older and more experienced, 9 times out
of 10, I let some years pass and I find myself arguing their position.
It's also interesting to note that these days virtually 100% of that
sort of discussion is with someone younger. Hardly conclusive, but
you can see a pattern emerging.
You are right in suggesting that there are other answers, but what you
miss is that they are not very likely to work. The field of operating
systems is well explored, in fact, I challenge you to name 5 things that
Linux has done which have not been done before. The point being that
the graph of choices is well pruned. Feel free to ignore the pruning,
there is always a chance that the old farts have pruned off a fruitful
branch, or times have changed soas to invalidate the reasoning; just be
warned that the chances are low.
What I'm trying to do is avoid having Linux go down some paths that I
have seen other people go down because those paths have *all* resulted
in a kernel that none of us would want. You can assert all you like
that you'll not make those mistakes, but having seen those same assertions
a half a dozen times before from a half a dozen different OS efforts, all
of which were staffed with talented and careful people, you'll forgive
my skepticism.
----- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/