Re: [PATCH] improve spinlock debugging

Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
04 Dec 2001 16:39:07 -0500


On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 16:25, george anzinger wrote:

> NO. The problem is the first example above. The spin_unlock will down
> count, but the spin_lockirq did NOT do the paired up count (been there,
> done that). This is where we need the spin_unlock_no_irq_restore.

Your right, I thought too fast. Then we need the proper macros ...

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/