Re: [PATCH] Endianness-aware mkcramfs

[H. Peter Anvin]

Followup to:  <[e-mail]>
By author:    Daniel Marmier <[e-mail]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> Here you are, against kernel 2.4.16. The patch is not as clean as one
> would like it to be, but we use it and it works well for us.
> 
> Basically it adds a "-b" (byteorder option) which can take four parameters:
>    -bb	creates a big-endian cramfs,
>    -bl	creates a little-endian cramfs,
>    -bh	creates a cramfs with the same endianness as the host,
>    -br	creates a cramfs with the reverse endianness as the host,
> where "host" refers to the machine running the mkcramfs program.
> 
> As told above, it could be cleaner, but I don't know of a nice method of
> accessing byteorder dependent data through structures.
> 

This isn't the right way to deal with this.  The right way to deal
with this is to get all systems to read cramfs the same way.

	-hpa
-- 
<[e-mail]> at work, <[e-mail]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<[e-mail]>