In fact, here's all I want to know about the whole CML2/kbuild 2.5 issue. Right
now I upgrade my kernel like this (simplified slightly):
<apply latest patches>
mv .config ..
make mrproper
mv ../.config .
make oldconfig
make dep
make bzlilo modules modules_install
<reboot>
Will I still be able to do it this simply in 2.5.x? (Assuming there's
eventually a 2.5.x I can get to compile cleanly. :-)
Wayne
John Stoffel <stoffel@casc.com> on 12/04/2001 10:31:10 AM
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>
cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com (bcc: Wayne
Brown/Corporate/Altec)
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5
Christoph> I still strongly object to it and I know lots of kernel
Christoph> hackers are the same opinion.
I'm not a hacker, but I think it's a good thing to move to CML2. I've
tested it and it's got some nice features. The Python issue I don't
think is too onerous to require of people. And wasn't there someone
out there porting CML2 to straight C code?
Why are people so wedded to the CML1 language spec anyway?
John
John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies
stoffel@lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-952-7548
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/