Re: PPC kernel fails when IDE built as modules

Benjamin Herrenschmidt (benh@kernel.crashing.org)
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 01:59:15 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue]"
Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Journaling pointless with today's hard disks?"
In reply to: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: PPC kernel fails when IDE built as modules"

>>Just thought I'd drop a note that recent kernel builds (2.4.17-pre1,2)
>>on PPC fail when IDE is built as modules.
>
>The fix for this is part of the big pmac merge I'm about to start
>with Marcelo. In the meantime, use the bitkeeper PPC tree
>(see http://www.penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml for details).

Hrm.. Sorry, it looks like you indeed have a good point here.

I'll see how we can fix that tomorrow.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Horst von Brand: "Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue]"
Previous message: Matthias Andree: "Re: Journaling pointless with today's hard disks?"
In reply to: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: PPC kernel fails when IDE built as modules"