Re: Coding style - a non-issue
Paul G. Allen (pgallen@randomlogic.com)
Sat, 01 Dec 2001 15:57:16 -0800
john slee wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 12:27:37PM -0800, Paul G. Allen wrote:
> > While 'pi', 'e', 'theta', 'phi', etc. are universally understood, things
> > like 'i', 'a', and 'idx' are not. I can use these for anything I want
> > and even for more than one thing, and they say nothing about what they
> > are for. 'i', 'j', etc. are fine as loop counters and array indexes
> > where their meaning is apparent by context, but are _not_ fine in other
>
> the meaning of 'i', 'j', 'k', is universal. show me a real world
> program (or programming book!) not from redmond that doesn't use these
> names for loop counters.
>
If you'd been paying attention, I discounted simple loop counters in an
early post.
PGA
--
Paul G. Allen
UNIX Admin II ('til Dec. 3)/FlUnKy At LaRgE (forever!)
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
www.akamai.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/