Re: 'spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7' -> read the 8259 datasheet !

[Martin Eriksson]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gunther Mayer" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Cc: "Chris Meadors" <[e-mail]>; "Martin Eriksson"
<[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: 'spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7' -> read the 8259 datasheet !

> "Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Chris Meadors wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Martin Eriksson wrote:
>
> ...
> ... rumours deleted (e.g. "printer status bits are all ORed into irq7")
> ...
>
> >From "Harris Semiconductor 82C59A Interrupt Controller Datasheet":
>   If no interrupt request is present at step 4 of either sequence
>   (i.e., the request was too short in duration), the 82C59A will
>   issue an interrupt level 7.

Uhmm... call me slow, but I don't get it 100%... so this message has NOTHING
to do with the LPT IRQ7? It just signals this because IRQ7 is the lowest
priority IRQ on the 8259A?

>
> 1. The irq controller sees an interrupt.
> 2. The irq controller signals "there is _some_ interrupt" to the cpu.
> 3. The CPU acks via INTA
> 4. The irq controller looks if the irq is still there
>    (and signals IRQ7 if the line is no longer active).

Umm.. so again.. this means that the IRQ is not held long enough for the PIC
to actually recognize *what* IRQ was asserted?

>
> You have some device which doesn't keep the IRQ raised long enough !
> (or the CPU doesn't service the irq for a too long time and the
>  edge triggered irq is de-asserted or even serviced by a polling routine)

Thanks a bunch for clearing this up (this far)!!

When we get a firm indication on the 'problem', could the "spurious 8259A
interrupt" message be de-obfuscated into something less unsettling?

PS. Real Men (tm) never reads the datasheets!

_____________________________________________________
|  Martin Eriksson <[e-mail]>
|  MSc CSE student, department of Computing Science
|  Umeå University, Sweden