Re: Too buggy even for Linux [Was Re: some questions about wedding]

Thomas Hofer (th@monochrom.at)
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:49:33 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Borsenkow Andrej: "Re: kapm-idled no longer idling CPU?"
Previous message: Victor Yodaiken: "Re: [PATCH] remove BKL from drivers' release functions"
In reply to: Anthony DeRobertis: "Re: Too buggy even for Linux [Was Re: some questions about wedding]"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Too buggy even for Linux [Was Re: some questions about wedding]"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Too buggy even for Linux [Was Re: some questions about wedding]"

Anthony DeRobertis wrote (Freitag, 30. November 2001 13:06):
> > We'll leave alone for the moment that husband and wife often seem
> > to be speaking completely different and unrelated protocols.
>
> Nah, same protocol, in theory. Just one was implemented by Micro$oft.

Cool. Is it the female-part? Has anyone an exploit?

Thomas. (Hoping for a DDoS next weekend)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Borsenkow Andrej: "Re: kapm-idled no longer idling CPU?"
Previous message: Victor Yodaiken: "Re: [PATCH] remove BKL from drivers' release functions"
In reply to: Anthony DeRobertis: "Re: Too buggy even for Linux [Was Re: some questions about wedding]"
Next in thread: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Too buggy even for Linux [Was Re: some questions about wedding]"
Reply: Mike Fedyk: "Re: Too buggy even for Linux [Was Re: some questions about wedding]"