Re: About 2.4.16

Mike Fedyk (mfedyk@matchmail.com)
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:51:52 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Colonel: "Re: RFC: ethernet links should remember routes the same as addresses"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.4.14 still not making fs dirty when it should"

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:04:49PM +0100, pil@mailnet.de wrote:
> Martin Eriksson wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Oh.. 2.4.13 was pretty usable too, so maybe 3 times slower?
> >
>
> Not for me. I reported an hfs-bug for 2.4.12 up to 2.4.14. So 6 times
> slower would be the best for the users and - I guess - developers too.
>

more/faster -pre and less/slower releases.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Colonel: "Re: RFC: ethernet links should remember routes the same as addresses"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.4.14 still not making fs dirty when it should"