Re: Linux 2.4.16

Anuradha Ratnaweera (anuradha@gnu.org)
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:44:35 +0600

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:38:23AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:30:08AM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > >
> > > final:
> > > - Fix 8139too oops (Philipp Matthias Hahn)
> >
> > Won't that be a good idea to keep the -final the same as the last -pre?
>
> I don't see why: the 8139 fix has been tested and it _fixes_ and oops: Its
> not an enhancement.

Seen, believed and agreed (who cares if I don't ...;))

Thanks for all who replied to my postings on this issue on and off the list.

Some of my postings may not have meant what I really wanted to mean, but those
were my humble openion towards a more stable (huh, to increase the value of
infinity ...;)) kernel. Just few cents, though.

Cheers,

Anruadha

-- 


Debian GNU/Linux (kernel 2.4.16)


#define FALSE   0               /* This is the naked Truth */
#define TRUE    1               /* and this is the Light */
	-- mailto.c


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/