Re: [PATCH] fix compile warnings in 2.4.15pre9

[Robert Love]

On Thu, 2001-11-22 at 18:54, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> How about something like (not real patches, but you get the idea:
> 
> @@ -4691,6 +4691,7 @@
>  	OUTL_DSP (SCRIPTA_BA (np, clrack));
> +out_stuck:
>  	return;
> -out_stuck:
>  }
>  
> @@ -5226,6 +5227,7 @@
>  
> +fail:
>  	return;
> -fail:
>  }

Yes, much better.  Besides looking better, gcc _may_ generate different
code (I don't know how smart it is in this case) that has these "fall
throughs" and that would mean (a) less code and (b) less jumps -- always
a win.

	Robert Love