I see your point - but someone has obiously decided to switch from malloc.h to slab.h, and I do not
see the point in having three references to malloc.h when malloc.h only prints a warning and then includes
slab.h
== Morten
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:54:29PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>
> admin@nextframe.net said:
> > Ok people - stop submitting patches which include malloc.h. Include
> > slab.h instead. :)
>
> Bah. I was sort of hoping we'd come to our collective senses and switch
> them all back.
>
> What does malloc.h do? Stuff to do with memory allocation, one presumes.
> What does slab.h do? Some random implementation detail that people have no
> business knowing about.
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
>
-- mvh Morten Helgesen UNIX System Administrator & C Developer Nextframe AS admin@nextframe.net / 93445641 http://www.nextframe.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/