Not just hope... they have a legitimate reason to expect that
guarantee from anything that advertises itself as S_IFREG. I really
think procfs files should advertise themselves as S_IFCHR if they
can't fully obey the semantics of S_IFREG files (including having a
working length in stat()!)
Such S_IFCHR devices can return 0 in st_rdev to signal userspace that
this is a device node keyed by special filesystem semantics rather
than by device number.
-hpa
-- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/