Re: Bug in ext3

[Mike Fedyk]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 10:20:55PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 08:09:16PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Nov 15, 2001  19:55 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > > What would be interesting to correlate is what inode 48 is (probably a
> > > > directory, or you wouldn't have noticed it at all), with the corruption
> > > > problems you are having while ext3 is loaded.
> > > 
> > > 48 /usr/lib/perl5/5.005/File/Copy.pm
> > > 
> > > Since this file is pretty small, I can only assume that it overwrote
> > > some adjacent files. There is some corruption in this file (luckily in
> > > the comment area :) starting at the 25th byte, and extending 12 bytes in
> > > length. Here's the values from hexedit:
> > > 
> > > 	00 00 00 01  00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00
> > 
> > No, this would be the only expected corruption - there are 3 32-bit
> > fields that that get written to disk in journal_update_superblock(),
> > and these are consistent with that.
> > 
> > That means the source of the other corruption is unknown.
> 
> The "other" corruption only occured while booted with the ext3-enabled
> kernel. They haven't appeared under the non-ext3 kernel at all. Even
> after it got mounted read-only, performing an fsck, and remounting
> read-write, it would reoccur over and over. So this "other" corruption
> doesn't even sound like it can be caused by the scenario you described
> (which sounds like a one shot problem).

Ben, just for kicks, try ext3 with 2.4.14 instead of 2.4.15-pre4.

Have you been able to reproduce this on another machine?

Also, post the output of lspci -vv.

Mike