Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols???

[Jeff Garzik]

Richard Gooch wrote:
> In fact, given the other code in the tree that doesn't conform to
> CodingStyle, it makes sense run lindent on the whole tree and make
> that available. As long as people understand that they should generate
> patches against the real tree, and not the lindented one.

We are slowly Lindenting the -real- tree, actually.  So, no, that
doesn't make sense.  See my mention of long-term maintainability
earlier...

WRT to other code, devfs is indeed being picked on, because devfs
-clearly- needs other eyes, and devfs is so far from current
CodingStyle.

Readability of devfs is IMHO far more important than the readability of
drivers/scsi/random_isa_driver.c.

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Only so many songs can be sung
Building 1024    | with two lips, two lungs, and one tongue.
MandrakeSoft     |         - nomeansno