Re: GPLONLY kernel symbols???

[Richard Gooch]

Alexander Viro writes:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Alexander Viro writes:
> > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > > > Dave Jones writes:
> > > > > How about running mtrr.c & devfs code through scripts/Lindent
> > > > > sometime btw?
> > > > 
> > > > That would be a step backwards: I wouldn't be able to read my own code
> > > > then.
> > > 
> > > You mean that you are unable to read any of the core kernel source?
> > > That would explain a lot...
> > 
> > Were you born rude, or did you have to practice it?
> 
> Excuse me?  You've just stated that you are unable to read the code
> in style enforced by Lindent.  kernel/*.c, mm/*.c, fs/*.c and large
> part of fs/*/*.c _are_ in that style.  I've asked you a perfectly
> legitimate (and obvious) question: "does it imply what it seems to
> imply?"  What's rude about that?

Are you being deliberately obtuse? Your "that would explain a lot"
comment is an obvious insult.

Al, I'm really tired of your snide comments. You've been hostile and
making personal attacks for years now. You've been rude and insulting
to other people on this list as well. Even if you don't care how
childish it appears, just save us all the bandwidth. We don't want to
play that game with you.

And I don't care to discuss this further. I know what your two
possible reactions are:
- you're not being rude (uh, yeah, right)
- it doesn't matter as long as your technical points are correct (I'm
  just quoting you there) (BTW: you're not infallible either).

				Regards,

					Richard....
Permanent: [e-mail]
Current:   [e-mail]