Re: [PATCH] fix loop with disabled tasklets

[David S. Miller]

   From: Mathijs Mohlmann <[e-mail]>
   Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:21:56 +0100
   
   	i'm not sure about the enable_tasklet bit. I think it will prevent
   people from calling tasklet_enable from within an interrupt handler. But then
   again, why do you want to do that? Thanx, velco and
   	
   	Any comments?

I've been looking at this and I sent Andrea+Linus private mail on this
to try and work out a fix.

You can't simply stop enabling the softirq when you hit the "locked
tasklet" condition.  That could deadlock the tasklet.

What really needs to happen is:

1) If tasklet is scheduled, but disabled, simply ignore it
   during tasklet processing.  Do not resignal softirq.
   But do leave it on the pending lists.

2) When tasklet enable brings t->count back to zero and
   tasklet is found to be scheduled, signal a local softirq.

To me, that would be the proper fix.  But I still haven't heard back
from Andrea or Linus yet :-)

Franks a lot,
David S. Miller
[e-mail]