Re: [PATCH] take 2 of the tr-based current

[Manfred Spraul]

"David S. Miller" wrote:
> 
>    From: Manfred Spraul <[e-mail]>
>    Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 15:54:03 +0100
> 
>    Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>    > If TR register only ever changes during cpu_init, I don't see why you
>    > cannot use const.
> 
>    The task register is only pure, not const.
> 
> As far as what the compiler can see or care about, it is
> const.
>
No. const == never changes.
get_TR changes if a task calls schedule, and return on another cpu.

<<<
+static unsigned get_TR(void) __attribute__ ((pure))
+{
+       unsigned tr;
+       __asm__("str %w0" : "=g" (tr));
+       return tr;
+}
+
+#define smp_processor_id()     ( ((get_TR() >> 3) - __FIRST_TSS_ENTRY)
>> 2 )
<<<
smp_processor_id() is definitively not const.

OTHO 'current' is const.
--
	Manfred