Re: Module Licensing? (thinking a little more)

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Thu, 8 Nov 2001 17:18:04 +0000

On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:00:45PM +0100, Drizzt Do'Urden wrote:
> Yes, clause 3.a) "machine readable source code". A .s file is, "machine
> readable source code" by the assembler and by people that have enough time
> to lost.. It is like head.S, but using numeric labels and other stuff of
> that kind.

Sigh.

"The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for
making modifications to it."

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/