Re: Suspected error in make dep

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Thu, 08 Nov 2001 23:30:53 +1100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Module Licensing?"
Previous message: BALBIR SINGH: "[PATCH]Problems with compling 2.4.14 on SMP and kernel versioning on modules set."
Maybe in reply to: BALBIR SINGH: "Suspected error in make dep"

On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 15:38:27 +0530,
"BALBIR SINGH" <balbir.singh@wipro.com> wrote:
>Pentium III, 128MB, Linux 2.4.13 while running make dep on 2.4.14
>
>sa1100fb.c:164:27: linux/cpufreq.h: No such file or directory
>I was wondering why this file is used in make dep. Did I miss something or
>should I wait for kbuild in 2.5?

make dep is fundamentally flawed, ignore all "file not found" messages.
Roll on kbuild 2.5, no more "make dep"!.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: Module Licensing?"
Previous message: BALBIR SINGH: "[PATCH]Problems with compling 2.4.14 on SMP and kernel versioning on modules set."
Maybe in reply to: BALBIR SINGH: "Suspected error in make dep"