Re: Yet another design for /proc. Or actually /kernel.
Erik Hensema (spamtrap@use.reply-to)
8 Nov 2001 08:56:21 GMT
John Levon (moz@compsoc.man.ac.uk) wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:41:26PM -0500, William Knop wrote:
>
>> You really consider this discussion to be unimportant? Granted, the lack of
>> organization in /proc is not a bug, but keeping the kernel organized is part
>> of maintenence. Like cleaning my room-- it's not a showstopper if it is
>> messy, but it is nicer and easier to work in when neat.
>
>Like cleaning your room, talking endlessly about how doesn't get you anywhere.
>Show some code ...
Just starting to code without giving much thought into it give us... the
current /proc. It may be a good idea to actually design the thing this
time.
--
Erik Hensema (erik@hensema.net)
I'm on the list, no need to Cc: me, though I appreciate one if your
mailer doesn't support the References header.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/