Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:23:51 +0000 (GMT)

> I just set up a RedHat 7.2 box with ext3, and after a few tests/chrashes,
> I see no difference at all. After a chrash, it really wants to run fsck
> anyway. I've tried ReiserFS before, with no fsck after chrashes - is this

Umm RH 7.2 after an unexpected shutdown will give you a 5 second count down
when you can choose to force an fsck - ext3 doesnt need an fsck but
sometimes folks might want to force it thats all
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/