Re: PROPOSAL: /proc standards (was dot-proc interface [was: /proc

Ben Greear (greearb@candelatech.com)
Tue, 06 Nov 2001 15:46:43 -0700

Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:

> On Tue, 2001-11-06 15:28:26 -0700, Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>
> wrote in message <20011106152826.C31923@codepoet.org>:
>
>>On Tue Nov 06, 2001 at 07:24:13PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>>>PROCESSOR=0
>>>VENDOR_ID=GenuineIntel
>>>CPU_FAMILY=6
>>>MODEL=6
>>>MODEL_NAME="Celeron (Mendocino)"
>>>.....
>>>
>
> PROCESSOR=1

or PROCESSOR1=1

Either way, it's still trivial to parse with perl or c/c++/Java
and probably a dozen other languages I don't know...

Ben

> ...
>
>
>>>. /proc/cpuinfo
>>>
>>I think we have a winner! If we could establish this
>>as policy that would be _sweet_!
>>
>
> What do you expect on a SMP system?
>
> MfG, JBG
>
> 

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>       <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc      http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD:  http://scry.wanfear.com     http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/