Re: [Ext2-devel] disk throughput

[Andrew Morton]

Alexander Viro wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > Surely the answer if you want short term write speed and long term balancing
> > is to use ext3 not ext2 and simply ensure that the relevant stuff goes to
> > the journal (which will be nicely ordered) first. That will give you some
> > buffering at least.
> 
> Alan, the problem is present in ext3 as well as in all other FFS derivatives
> (well, FreeBSD had tried to deal that stuff this Spring).
> 

Yep.  Once we're seek-bound on metadata and data, the occasional
seek-and-squirt into the journal won't make much difference, and
the other write patterns will be the same.

Interestingly, current ext3 can do a 600 meg write in fifty
seconds, whereas ext2 takes seventy.  This will be related to the
fact that ext3 just pumps all the buffers into submit_bh(), 
whereas ext2 fiddles around with all the write_locked_buffers()
stuff.  I think.  Or the intermingling of indirects with data
is tripping ext2 up.  The additional seeking is audible.

-