drivers/ide/ide-dma.c::ide_get_or_set_dma_base
741 if (hwif->mate && hwif->mate->dma_base) {
742 dma_base = hwif->mate->dma_base - (hwif->channel ? 0 : 8);
} else {
dma_base = pci_resource_start(dev, 4);
-> We take this branch first (or I've missed where
mate->dma_base is set)
[...]
if ((inb(dma_base+2) & 0x80)) { /* simplex device? */
793 if ((!hwif->drives[0].present && !hwif->drives[1].present) ||
-> do_identify is called later, we pass this test
794 (hwif->mate && hwif->mate->dma_base)) {
-> + we can't succeed this one or it means we would have
-> passed through the other branch (742). It would imply
-> at least one mate accepts to enable DMA.
printk("%s: simplex device: DMA disabled\n", name);
dma_base = 0;
I'd say either mate->dma_base is set too soon for both mate (and they're both
guaranteed to generate dma_base = 0 as soon as they reach 794) or do_identify
is called too late (and dma_base = 0 because of 793).
I haven't found a lot of dma_base field setting and they seem to happen late.
M. Hedrick ?
-- Ueimor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/