Re: Alsa 0.9beta8a with 2.4.{12,13} ?

[Robert Love]

On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 17:15, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Up to kernel version 2.4.12 the Alsa 0.9beta8a version was working
> for my needs. Sometimes the startup script claimed that there is
> no soundcard (via686a), but after one or two restarts of this 
> script the onboard chip was detected.

The Warnings are unrelated and are because no MODULE_LICENSE tag has
been declared in each of those modules.  For each, the ALSA folks need
to put a:

	MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

in the source.  I am assuming ALSA is GPL, and has no additional
restrictions.

I'm looking over the ChangeLog for 2.4.12->2.4.13 and I don't see
anything that sticks out as "I broke ALSA!"  The ALSA team will figure
it out.

	Robert Love