Your method of placing "initrx=xxx" and "root=xxx" is similar to my
method of stuffing those values into /proc/sys/kernel/real_root_dev once
the pivot_root is complete; I am not really happy with that solution,
not the least of which because it is an undocumented work-around and
somewhat unexpected behavior for a system call that is to (presumably)
replace or augment change_root.
I was also hoping that Warner or Hans would chime-in either in defense
of the current documentation or with clarifications...
E
HPA wrote:
>>
>> I am mystified that the call to 'exec /sbin/init' works
>> if you are using the standard (you mention "based on RedHat7.1"
>> util-linux") /sbin/init proggie, and that a standard RH7.1
>> initscripts would not complain when the root filesystem is already
>> mounted r/w.
>>
>> I would also guess that you are susceptible to the kernel's
>> change_root call if your /sbin/init terminates. I'll have to
>> play with the disk a bit.
>>
>
> I modify the initscripts to not try to fsck and remount the root --
> its a ramfs (tmpfs in a later version) after all. If I had been
> mounting a filesystem off the harddisk I would either have mounted it
> readonly and left the init scripts as-is, or fscked it before
> mounting.
>
> I pass the following command line options to the kernel (this is set
> up in isolinux.cfg):
>
> append initrd=initrd.gz root=/dev/ram0 init=/linuxrc single
>
> By specifying root=/dev/ram0 and an explicit init (which I'm calling
> /linuxrc but could just as easily have called /sbin/init) I'm telling
> the kernel that this is the final root, and effectively turn off most
> of the initrd legacy weirdness.
>
> If /sbin/init exits, the kernel panics, just like it would normally do
> if init goes away.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/