Which is better at vm, and why? 2.2 or 2.4

Patrick McFarland (unknown@panax.com)
Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:02:28 -0400

--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Now, the great kernel hacker, ac, said that 2.2 is better at vm in low memo=
ry situations than 2.4 is. Why is this? Why hasnt someone fixed the 2.4 cod=
e?

--=20
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com

--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE7yHOj8Gvouk7G1cURAhsjAKCTUvnaTVaIY+Ki4lbp4JkqEZk4EQCeNoRK
Do4X+MYWEfVE4sI5iuz7ALI=
=o9hz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/