Re: Partitioning problems in 2.4.11

Stephan von Krawczynski (skraw@ithnet.com)
Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:34:21 +0200


On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 18:59:03 -0400 (EDT) Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>
> > a) -10-ac11, -10-ac12 and -12 with your patch all behave like -11.
>
> _Ouch_. So even bread()-based variant fails to read extended partition
> table in some cases.
>
> Hmm... Just in case - what processor are you using?

Hi Alexander,

just a short comment: I got a host with PIII-500 and the same problem. A
partition on primary IDE (single partition for whole drive) vanished during use
of 2.4.10(SuSE 7.3)/11. System works flawlessly otherwise. It is booting from
SCSI, ide was only data :-). It has 384 MB RAM.

Regards,
Stephan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/