Re: Compile Filure on 2.4.10-ac10+preempt+smp

Mike Fedyk (mfedyk@matchmail.com)
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 23:00:07 -0700


On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:34:41AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 01:24, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 01:15:25AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> > >
> > > Ahh, yes. Thank you for spotting this. include/asm-i386/spinlock.h has
> > > two separate defines for spin_unlock and we only renamed one of them. I
> > > guess you hit the conditional that used the other define...
> > >
> > > The attached patch fixes it.
> > >
> >
> > Thank you. Will compile now...
>
> Let me know, I didn't test :)
>
> If it works I will merge it...
>

Compilation success.

Will boot and run over the next couple days.

> > > I only keep around patches to the last official kernel, plus the latest
> > > -pre and -ac I patched. Since the patch itself is being updated, its a
> > > pain to backport to older kernels.
> > >
> >
> > No, I'm not asking for backport, just links to one version back just in case
> > the latest patch has a bug much like this...
> >
> > I'd rather run one (working) version back than have to go to UP just to get
> > preempt... Needless to say, I chose to keep smp.
>
> OK, then try editing the URL, I scp the patches in and don't ssh in and
> actually clean the stuff up but every here and there.
>
> ie, change the ac10 to ac9 in the URL.
>

Yep, thought of that, but didn't try it. I figured it would be better to
report than to go silent...

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/