Yes and No. ;-)
Robert have a look at the direct comparisons of dual 1.2 GHz Athlon TB and
1.2 GHz Athlon MP. There are many flowting around. The Palomino core
enhancements are even at the same chip clock very good for SMP.
http://www.anandtech.com/chipsets/showdoc.html?i=1483&p=1
> I'm not saying non-Palomino-core Athlons don't have SMP issues.
They don't have issues but they are (much) slower in dual configurations for
specific test cases.
> I'm sure something is different -- a lot of errata is fixed (and added) in
> between core revisions. I'm just not so sure a measurable difference is
> easily shown...especially when there are other reasons for a performance
> increase in the core itself.
The differences _are_ easily shown.
So the Athlon XP (Palomino core) _IS_ the way to go...8-)
Regards,
Dieter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/