Re: Desperately missing a working "pselect()" or similar...

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > Hmmm... would you say the "siglongjmp" method is better than the "self-pipe"
> > method for a select on both file descriptors and signals too?
> 
> siglongjmp doesnt have to make any syscalls so intuitively I'd say it
> ought to be more efficient

Are you sure? Doesn't sigsetjmp() call sigprocmask in order to obtain
the current signal mask?

In the glibc I read:

int
__sigjmp_save (sigjmp_buf env, int savemask)
{
  env[0].__mask_was_saved = (savemask &&
                             __sigprocmask (SIG_BLOCK, (sigset_t *) NULL,
                                            &env[0].__saved_mask) == 0);

  return 0;
}

*sigh* things could be so easy if there was a working pselect()...

Regards,

Lutz vieweg

--
 Dipl. Phys. Lutz Vieweg | email: [e-mail]
 Innovative Software AG  | Phone/Fax: [phone]/-505
 Feuerbachstrasse 26-32  | http://www.isg.de/people/lkv/
 60325 Frankfurt am Main | ^^^ PGP key available here ^^^