Re: %u-order allocation failed
Mikulas Patocka (mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz)
Sun, 7 Oct 2001 00:36:23 +0200 (CEST)
> In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.1011006210743.7808D-100000@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> you wrote:
>
> > NOTE: no allocations in IRQ are safe. Not only high-order ones.
> > Allocation in IRQ may fail any time and you must recover without lost of
> > functionality (network can lose packets any time, if you are doing some
> > general device driver, you must preallocate all buffers in process
> > context).
>
> how again do you deal with calling vfree() on the ones where you used
> vmalloc instead of the buddy allocator ?
It's in the patch: if someone calls get_free_pages on vmallocated memory,
it will be freed with vfree instead of __get_free_pages.
Of course you can't allocate memory in process context and free it in
interrupt context - which you could do without __GFP_VMALLOC.
Mikulas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/