Re: 2.4.9-ac16 good perfomer?

[Mike Fedyk]

On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 12:50:21AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Thomas Hood wrote:
> 
> > Either 2.4.9-ac16 has much improved VM performance over
> > previous 2.4 kernels (under moderate load, at least), or someone
> > sneaked in to my apartment last night and upgraded my machine
> > while I was asleep.  I'm leaning toward the latter explanation.
> 
> Now that the -ac VM was stable for a few weeks, I thought
> it might be time to sneak in some big performance changes,
> finally.
> 
> They seem to work ;)
> 

Is it normal to have Inact_target 1/4 of main memory (64MB of 256MB RAM)?
In previous versions, this value would fluctuate with the load of the system.

Is this expected?