The only thing I reacted to in these patches is:
> diff -urN virgin-2.4.10/init/main.c numa-2.4.10/init/main.c
> --- virgin-2.4.10/init/main.c Thu Sep 20 21:02:01 2001
> +++ numa-2.4.10/init/main.c Thu Sep 27 11:57:21 2001
> @@ -490,9 +490,19 @@
>
> #else
>
> +/* Where the IO area was mapped on multiquad, always 0 otherwise */
> +void *xquad_portio = NULL;
...
This is _definitely_ the wrong place to have magic x86-only code.
Why don't you just move that into the top of smp_boot_cpus()?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/