Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:43:42 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Josh MacDonald: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
Previous message: Simon Kirby: "Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2"

> But this printk breaks a standard SMP machine without my patches (well,
> just this tiny printk part), not just the NUMA boxes ....

That makes the situation more interesting. Can you serialize the output
and see why ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Josh MacDonald: "Re: [patch] softirq performance fixes, cleanups, 2.4.10."
Previous message: Simon Kirby: "Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.10-B2"