Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:09:17 +0100 (BST)

> FWIW, I still think that means that the console locking changes are broken
> -
> adding a printk shouldn't panic the kernel. I'll go look at the console
> locking
> changes (*and* fix my disgusting hack ;-) )

I suspect the panic has nothing to do with adding the printk, but merely
that the timing patterns of your disgusting hack have changed

Happy logical analysers 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/